Skip to main content

10. References

  1. Gilks, C.B., et al., Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma. Hum Pathol, 2008. 39(8): p. 1239-51.
  2. Kobel, M., et al., Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med, 2008. 5(12): p. e232.
  3. Singh, N., et al., Primary site assignment in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: Consensus statement on unifying practice worldwide. Gynecol Oncol, 2016. 141(2): p. 195-198.
  4. Singh, N., et al., Adopting a Uniform Approach to Site Assignment in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: The Time has Come. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2016. 35(3): p. 230-7.
  5. Buys, S.S., et al., Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA, 2011. 305(22): p. 2295-303.
  6. Jacobs, I.J., et al., Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2016. 387(10022): p. 945-956.
  7. Kobayashi, H., et al., A randomized study of screening for ovarian cancer: a multicenter study in Japan. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2008. 18(3): p. 414-20.
  8. McAlpine, J.N., et al., Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014. 210(5): p. 471 e1-11.
  9. Morelli, M., et al., Prophylactic salpingectomy in premenopausal low-risk women for ovarian cancer: primum non nocere. Gynecol Oncol, 2013. 129(3): p. 448-51.
  10. Falconer, H., et al., Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2015. 107(2).
  11. Lessard-Anderson, C.R., et al., Effect of tubal sterilization technique on risk of serous epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol, 2014. 135(3): p. 423-7.
  12. Madsen, C., et al., Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: a nationwide case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2015. 94(1): p. 86-94.
  13. Narod, S.A., et al., Oral contraceptives and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group. N Engl J Med, 1998. 339(7): p. 424-8.
  14. Whittemore, A.S., R. Harris, and J. Itnyre, Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies. IV. The pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Am J Epidemiol, 1992. 136(10): p. 1212-20.
  15. Narod, S.A., et al., Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2002. 94(23): p. 1773-9.
  16. Kehoe, S., et al., Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 2015. 386(9990): p. 249-57.
  17. Vergote, I., et al., Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med, 2010. 363(10): p. 943-53.
  18. Yedema, C.A., et al., Use of serum tumor markers in the differential diagnosis between ovarian and colorectal adenocarcinomas. Tumour Biol, 1992. 13(1-2): p. 18-26.
  19. Vermeulen, C.K.M., et al., Only complete tumour resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers benefit over suboptimal debulking in advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2017. 219: p. 100-105.
  20. Katsumata, N., et al., Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2009. 374(9698): p. 1331-8.
  21. Pignata, S., et al., Carboplatin plus paclitaxel once a week versus every 3 weeks in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (MITO-7): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2014. 15(4): p. 396-405.
  22. Harter, P., et al., Prognostic and predictive value of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) score in surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2014. 132(3): p. 537-41.
  23. Pujade-Lauraine, E., et al., Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2017. 18(9): p. 1274-1284.
  24. Swisher, E.M., et al., Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2017. 18(1): p. 75-87.
  25. Davis, A., A.V. Tinker, and M. Friedlander, "Platinum resistant" ovarian cancer: what is it, who to treat and how to measure benefit? Gynecol Oncol, 2014. 133(3): p. 624-31.
  26. Pujade-Lauraine, E., et al., Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: The AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol, 2014. 32(13): p. 1302-8.
  27. Oseledchyk, A., et al., Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I endometrioid or clear cell ovarian cancer in the platinum era: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Cohort Study, 2000-2013. Ann Oncol, 2017. 28(12): p. 2985-2993.
  28. Prendergast, E.N., et al., Three versus six cycles of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in early stage clear cell ovarian carcinoma - A multi-institutional cohort. Gynecol Oncol, 2017. 144(2): p. 274-278.
  29. McAlpine, J.N., et al., HER2 overexpression and amplification is present in a subset of ovarian mucinous carcinomas and can be targeted with trastuzumab therapy. BMC Cancer, 2009. 9: p. 433.
  30. Gershenson, D.M., et al., Hormonal Maintenance Therapy for Women With Low-Grade Serous Cancer of the Ovary or Peritoneum. J Clin Oncol, 2017. 35(10): p. 1103-1111.
  31. Pignata, S., et al., Carboplatin plus paclitaxel versus carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian cancer: the MITO-2 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol, 2011. 29(27): p. 3628-35.
  32. Narod, S.A., et al., Screening mammography and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. Lancet Oncol, 2006. 7(5): p. 402-6.
  33. Warner, E., et al., Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA, 2004. 292(11): p. 1317-25.
  34. Chay, W.Y., et al., Outcomes of Incidental Fallopian Tube High-Grade Serous Carcinoma and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma in Women at Low Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2016. 26(3): p. 431-6.
  35. Long Roche, K.C., et al., Risk-reducing salpingectomy: Let us be opportunistic. Cancer, 2017. 123(10): p. 1714-1720.
  36. Patrono, M.G., et al., Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC): A comprehensive review. Gynecol Oncol, 2015. 139(3): p. 568-72.
  37. Rustin, G.J., et al., Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomised trial. Lancet, 2010. 376(9747): p. 1155-63.
SOURCE: 10. References ( )
Page printed: . Unofficial document if printed. Please refer to SOURCE for latest information.

Copyright © BC Cancer. All Rights Reserved.

    Copyright © 2024 Provincial Health Services Authority